Showing posts with label islam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label islam. Show all posts

Worship and Prayer

Worship and Prayer
by  (Martyr) Murtadha Mutahari
We sometimes notice points in our Islamic interpretations that raise questions for
some of us in connection with worship. For example we are told in the case of prayer
that either the Prophet or the Imams have said, "Prayer is the pillar of religion," or if
we think of religion as a tent, 'prayer is the pole that keeps it standing." This remark
is also quoted from the narrations attributed to the Prophet, "The requisite for the
acceptance of other human deeds is the acceptance of prayer". In other words, the
good deeds of the human being will be null and void if prayer is incorrect and thereby
unacceptable.
Another Tradition says, "Prayer is the means of proximity of every virtuous being to
God." Another Tradition says that the devil is always uneasy with a believer and
shuns him who is devoted to his prayer. The Quran, too, shows the remarkable
importance of prayer in many verses.
But sometimes it is stated by some persons that all these traditions about prayer
must be forged and unreliable and uttered not by the Prophet and his successors but
by some devotees in order to win more followers particularly in the 2nd and 3rd
centuries of the hegira when the matter of worship had gone to such excess that it
had more or less led to monasticism and Sufism.
We see that some people concentrated all their efforts on acts of worship to such an
extent that they ignored other religious duties. For example there was among Ali's
companions a man called Rabi' ibn Husain, who was later known as Khajah Rabi'
whose tomb is in Mashhad. He was known as one of the eight famous ascetics of the
Islamic world and he went so far in asceticism and devotion that he had dug his own
grave long before his death. (It is said that for twenty years he never spoke a word
about worldly matters). Sometimes he went and lay in it reminding himself that the
grave was his home. The only words he was ever heard to say besides prayer was
on the occasion of hearing of Imam Husain's martyrdom. He said, "Woe upon these
people who murdered the dear descendant of their Prophet." It is reported that
afterwards he repented having uttered a sentence other than the invocation of God.
He was a warrior in the time of Ali, peace be upon him, and one day he came to
Hadrat Ali and said that they had doubts about that war they were fighting, as it
seemed to them to be unlawful, for they were fighting against those who in their
prayer turned their faces to Mecca and uttered the formulas of the Islamic creed. This
man at the same time did not want to abandon Ali, peace be upon him, so he asked
to be given a task in which there was no doubt.


Ali, peace be upon him, agreed and sent him to a frontier again as a soldier so that in
case of fighting he would face non-Muslims or idolaters. This man was a type of
ascetic of the time but of what worth was his asceticism and worship? It is useless to
be the follower of a man like Ali, peace be upon him, and at the same time have
doubts about the way shown by him in a holy war. Sometimes people use the
phrase, "Why should one observe a fast based on doubt and uncertainty? It is
worthless." Islam requires insight combined with practice but Khajah Rabi' had no
insight. He lived in the time of Mu'awiyyah and his son Yazid. He had nothing to do
with the social problems of the Islamic society and he used to retire to a corner
praying day and night and uttering nothing but the Name of God and regretting his
own remark about the martyrdom of Imam Husain, peace be upon him.
This kind of thing does not accord with Islamic teachings and as the saying goes, "An
ignorant person either goes too fast or too slowly." Some may say that the phrase,
"Prayer is the pillar of religion," is not in harmony with Islamic teachings since Islam
pays more attention to social matters than any other. Islam says, "God orders to do
justice and benevolence. " (16:92) We sent our prophets with manifestations
and the Book and justice to make people do justice also." (57:25) It commands
people to direct others to goodness and forbid evil (3:110) Islam as a great religion is
the creed of activity and work. If these matters are important in Islam, then acts of
worship and devotion are not so significant. Thus, according to such people, one
should follow social teachings and leave acts of devotion and prayer to idle people
who have no other task to perform.
But such thoughts are wrong and very dangerous. Islam should be recognized as it
is. I emphasize this point since I feel that our society is suffering from a sickness.
Unfortunately those who have religious ardor are two groups: One group follow the
way of Rabi' and think of Islam only as a creed for prayers, hymns and pilgrimage
and refer to certain standard books of theology to guide them. They have nothing to
do with the world or social regulations or Islamic principles and education.
The reaction to the slowness of this group is the appearance of a second group who
go too fast and move on the path of excess. They pay all their attention to social
matters, which in itself is a worthy attitude, but ignore acts of worship. I have met
people who can well afford to go on a pilgrimage to Mecca, an injunction which is
regarded as an important matter in Islam. They ignore prayers, and put aside the
matter of imitating a religious leader. They believe that problems related to acts of
worship should be solved by oneself, without the need of the guidance of others.
Thus everyone is assumed to be a religious expert or a jurisprudent. One is one's
own physician and has no need of consulting a doctor or a specialist. There are
some who are slack in fasting and its conditions in the case of permanent residence
or on a journey and do not believe in making amends for failure to perform acts of


worship in their proper time and place.
Both groups consider themselves Muslims but they are not wholly so. Islam does not
agree with the phrase, "To believe in some things and disbelieve in other things."79It
cannot agree with the acceptance of worship coupled with the rejection of its moral
and social questions, or vice versa. You notice that whenever the Quran says,
"Perform your ritual prayer," it is followed by, "Pay your alms."
The first injunction concerns the relation between a creature and God and the
second one shows the relation between one creature and others. Thus a true Muslim
has a dual responsibility towards God and towards human beings and to their society
in a permanent way. No Islamic society can be built without worship and invocation
of God and prayer and fasting. In the same way, no pious society can exist without
directing to goodness and forbidding evils and without kindly relations between
individuals, even though a person may be a pious individual.
We see Ali, peace be upon him, as the most exalted, pious man, so much so that his
worship was proverbial, a worship full of terror and love and tears. After his death, a
man called Zirar, who was a companion of his, met Mu'awiyyah who asked him to
describe Ali, peace be upon him, for him. Zirar narrated something he had witnessed
about Ali, peace be upon him. He said, "One night I saw him in his special
worshipping place of worship.' He was twisting with the fear of God like a man bitten
by a snake and weeping with deep sorrow and saying, 'Oh, for the fire of hell'";
Mu'awiyyah wept on hearing this.
Before Ali's death, Mu'awiyyah met Adass bin Hatam and intended to provoke him
against Ali, peace be upon him, so he asked him about his three sons who had been
killed fighting for Ali, peace be upon him. He wished to hear Adass blame Ali, peace
be upon him and so he said, "Was it fair of him to deprive you of your three sons and
save his own sons from death in the battlefield?"
Adass answered, "It was I who was unfair to him. I should not be alive while he is
buried in the earth." When Mu'awiyyah saw that he had failed in his purpose, he
asked Adass to describe Ali, peace be upon him, fully for him, which he did. When he
ended his narration, he noticed tears flowing down Mu'awiyyah's beard and wiping
them with his sleeve, saying, "Alas! Time is too sterile to produce a man like Ali." You
see how truth reveals itself.
But was Hadrat Ali only a pious man of the altar? No. We see him also as the most
social being, well aware of the conditions of the poor and helpless and all who
brought their complaints to him. Though he was a Caliph, he went among the people,
dealing with their affairs. When he met merchants he shouted, "You should first go


and learn Islamic questions of trade." In other words, before engaging in commerce,
they should know divine injunctions about what is lawful and unlawful in every deal.
He is also reported to have used a phrase to a poor beggar who begged him for
something. Ali, peace be upon him, looked at him and saw that he was capable of
working but had chosen begging as a trade. He gave him advice and said, "Follow
your honor and dignity, " a phrase that he addressed to every person. For work
brings dignity and honor.
Ali, peace be upon him, is thus a true Muslim: Pious in worship, a just judge in the
court, a brave soldier and commander on the battlefield, a fine orator at the pulpit, a
remarkable teacher in his chair, and a wonderful and perfect example in every other
accomplishment.
Islam can never approve of half-hearted acceptance of its injunctions or belief in
some of them and not in others. This is a wrong way adopted by some ascetics who
considered Islam to consist of praying, or those who ignored acts of devotion
altogether.
The Quran says, "Muhammad is the Prophet of God and those who are with him
are hard against the unbelievers, compassionate among themselves. " (48:29)
In this sentence, the feature of an Islamic community is portrayed. In the first part of
it, the matter of following faith and the Prophet is expressed and in the latter part, the
question of standing firmly against infidels is mentioned. Thus these seeming
devotees who make a mosque their home and say no word when they are driven on
by a single soldier, are not Muslims. The most important quality of a Muslim
according to the Quran is showing firmness and strength against an enemy.
The Quran says, "Faint not, neither sorrow; you shall be the upper ones if you
are believers." (3:133) Islam does not allow weakness in religion. Will Durant says in
his History of Civilization that no religion but Islam calls upon its followers to be so
strong and steadfast.
To bend the neck with helplessness, to dress poorly and in a dirty way, to walk lazily
and to pretend to be forelorn and indifferent to all around you and sigh and groan are
all contrary to Islam. The Quran says, "And as for the favor of your Lord,
announce (it)." (93:11) God has given you blessings like health and strength. Why
do you show yourself so helpless? This is ingratitude. Ali, peace be upon him, was
never such a man. He stood ably and strongly against enemies.
What about being kind to others ? We sometimes meet devotees who are never kind
and are usually glum and unsociable. They never laugh and seldom smile as if the


whole of humanity is indebted to them and yet they suppose themselves to be
attached to Islam. Is it enough to stand firmly against enemies and be kind to
Muslims? The answer is no. The Quran says, "You will see them bowing down,
prostrating themselves, seeking grace from God and good pleasure." (48:29)
This speaks of those who have the two above qualities of steadfastness and
kindness and in their prayers and prostrations sink so deeply in their devotion that
you can see in their faces all signs of chastity and godliness.
It is narrated from the Prophet that the disciples of Christ asked him with whom they
should associate and he answered, "Sit with someone whose sight reminds you of
God, whose speech increases your knowledge and whose conduct persuades you
into doing good." The verse continues, "That is their description in the Old
Testament and their description in the New Testament like a seed-produce that
puts forth its sprout, then strengthens it so it becomes stout and stands firmly
on its stem, delighting the sowers that He may enrage the unbelievers on
account of them." (48:29).
A nation possessing all the above attributes must be a remarkably find nation. Now,
tell me, why should Muslims be so decadent, docile and miserable. Which of those
qualities mentioned before do we possess? What should we expect? Although we
admit that Islam is a social creed, why should we scorn worship and prayer and
communion with God? Let me assure you that taking prayers lightly is a sin as
ignoring them is a sin.
On the death of Imam Ja'far Sadiq, peace be upon him, as Abu Bassir came to offer
Umm ul-Hanida his condolences, the latter wept and so did the former. Umm ul-
Hanida then narrated something that had happened in the last moments of the life of
the Imam. She said that he sank into a trance and then opened his eyes and asked
for all his relatives to be present. After they had all gathered there, the Imam
addressed them the following remark and then died. He said, "Those who take ritual
prayers lightly will never gain our intercession."89You see that he did not speak of
those who ignore ritual prayers altogether, for, the consequence of that is obvious.
What does 'taking the ritual prayers lightly' mean? It means that inspite of having
time, an opportunity, one may postpone them and just before it is getting too late,
perform the acts of devotion hastily and perfunctorily, without giving the mind and
spirit the necessary tranquility before beginning to say the ritual prayer.
Experience has shown that in a household where ritual prayers are taken lightly, no
interest is shown by its members to pray or to pray properly. One should choose a
spot in the house allotted to acts of devotion, or, if possible, a separate room for
them and carry on with ablution without haste and spread a clean prayer-carpet and
accompany all the preliminary acts with the convocation of God. Ali, peace be upon
him, began with, "In the Name of God and with the help of God. Oh God place me


among those who repent; place me among those who cleanse themselves."
Two nights ago I spoke about repentance and explained that repentance meant
purifying oneself. Washing the body is the prelude to purifying the spirit; it refreshens
the face, but since the intention is to cleanse the spirit, too, it gives one a sacred
aspect. Ali, peace be upon him, in his ablution prayed to God to illuminate his face on
the Day of the Resurrection where many faces are black with shame and sin. Then
he said this prayer on washing his right hand, "Oh God, on the Day of Resurrection,
put my book of deeds in my right hand," and on washing his left hand, he said, "Oh
God, do not give me my book of deeds in my left hand nor from behind my back. Oh
God, do not let it be shackled to my neck; I seek refuge from You from the fire of
hell."
Then, on touching his forehead with water, he said, "Merge me into your grace and
blessings." Then on touching his feet with water he said, "Oh God, direct my efforts
towards such a path of your satisfaction."
Such an ablution which is accompanied by so many pleadings is of a different worth
and merit than what most of us are accustomed to perform. We should not lightly
disregard all these rites and confine ourselves only to the absolutely obligatory parts.
Let us see what religious authorities say about this. Should we repeat the following
sentence three times or only once, "Glory be to God, praise be God, there is no god
but God and God is great." An authority may say, "Once is enough, since it is
obligatory but the second and third repetitions are recommended." Should we, on the
basis of this verdict, confine ourselves to saying this prayer only once?
In the same way, fasting may be taken lightly. I am saying this as a joke, but if I were
God I would not accept such fasts. I know some people who stay awake at night in
the month of Ramadhan, not to worship and pray, but to drink tea, smoke and eat
fruit. In the morning, they say their ritual prayers and go to sleep. Some of them
sleep all day and wake up near sunset to say their daily ritual prayers hastily before it
is too late and get ready to break their fast. What kind of a fast is this? When you do
not give yourself the chance of feeling the pain of abstemiousness? This is fasting
lightly and is really an insult to a fast.
Again we go on a pilgrimage to Mecca but perform the rites lightly in the same way
as our prayers and fasts. Similarly the matter of the call to prayer may be taken
lightly; it is said that the call to prayer should be utterest melodiously to attract and
invite people to prayer, in the same way that the Quran should be recited clearly,
fluently and with a fine voice. Some people are gifted witll a fine voice, but if you ask
them to sing out the call to prayer, they consider it below their dignity to be known as


a muizzin. But it is really an honor to be one. Ali himself was one, even when he was
a Caliph. There is no disgrace attached to this task and no nobility to forsake it.
Thus no act of worship should be taken lightly. The merit of Islam is in its
comprehensiveness, not in being so absorbed in devotion as to ignore every other
duty, nor to be so involved in social matters to forget acts of devotion. Although a
prayer is for its own sake and for proximity to God, if we scorn worship, we are
ignoring other duties, too. Worship is the executive and guarantor of other Islamic
injunctions.
Here I end my discourse and pray God to make us true worshippers, to acquaint us
with the comprehensiveness of Islam, to make us whole-hearted Muslims, grant us
pure intentions, forgive our sins in these precious nights, and grant salvation to our
deceased ones.

Spiritual Discourses-The School of Humanity

The School of Humanity
by  (Martyr) Murtadha Mutahari
The subject of our discourse is 'the school of humanity'. The human being who is the
only inquisitive being in the world that we know, has always been subjected to
investigation and discussion.
The word 'humanity' has always been connected with a sense of loftiness and
sanctity as a being superior to animals from various points of view, such as
knowledge justice, freedom, moral conscience, etc. Although many of humanity's
sacred objects have been subjected to doubt and even denial, apparently no school
of thought has yet gone so far as to scorn the special dignity of humanity andits
superiority over other Creatures.
This fact has been elegantly expressed in the poems of Rumi and Sa'adi and by
other poets of ours. This topic is also the theme of most of the world's literature, both
religious and non-religious, in which the question of humanity and its glorification has
been described. In Islamic literature, too, both in Persian and Arabic, we come
across many such statements.
In the last two centuries, with the great advance of science, humanity has suddenly
fallen from that pedestal of sanctity it had always been given. It fell with a real crash
since the more one is elevated, the greater is the damage Caused by the fall. In the
past, mankind has been exacted to the rank of a demi-god as witnessed in the
poems of Hafiz and other poets.
The first discovery of humanity was the form of the universe which revolutionized its
ideas. Before that, the earth was believed to be the center of the universe round
which all the plants and stars revolved. Science proved that the earth was a small
planet which revolved around the sun and the solar System was only an insignificant
part of the universe.
It was then that the position of humanity as the center of all possibilities and as the
goal of creation was subjected to doubt and denial, and no one dared any longer to
make claims about its exalted position. Then, another severe blow dealt, was the
idea that the human being was no longer a divine creature and vice gerent of God
upon the earth was given up.
Biological research on the question of evolution and the origin of species at once
showed the relationship of people with those same animals which they Scorned and


despised. It proved them to be an evolved form of a monkey or some other animal
and thus they lost their divine origin. Another strong blow as against humanity's
apparently brilliant record of activities, namely, that it could act in such a way that
showed only goodness and benevolence, whose motive was only the love of Cod,
and lacking all animal aspects. The new thesis was that the claim of humanity to all
that sanctity and virtue was false and all the activities to which it had given the name
of the love of knowledge, art, beauty, morality and conscience, prayer and devotion
and everything supernatural, are similar to those which can be found in animals, too,
except in a more complex form and mechanism. It was said that the stomach is the
source and cause of all activities. Some went so far as to say that the stomach was
also the basis of its thoughts and feelings. There were still others who considered
this position too high and claimed that the human being was even lower than he is.
Eventually it was concluded that this being who had formerly claimed divine origin
and exaltation must be subjected to a careful study to discover its true nature.
Another theory was offered that there is no difference between humans, plants and
even inanimate objects. There is, of course, a difference in the texture and form, but
not in the substance of which they were all made. It was stated that spirit and divine
breath were non-existent because the human being is a machine which is only more
complicated than other machines such as cars, planes, and satellites; that is, only a
mechanical creature.
This was a great blow to humanity and yet human values were not wholly
condemned except in some schools of thought where ideas like peace, freedom,
spirituality, justice and compassion were considered as jokes.
But since the middle of the 19th century, humanity has won fresh attention in
philosophical schools Such as schools of humanity and even worship of human
beings. In the past the human being was only a sign of spirituality and the Quran
speaks of the human being as being the worthiest creature through whom God could
be understood.
Now the human being is trying to recover its former honor and sanctity and become a
goal in itself but without the adoption of the former criteria and without a regard for its
divine or non-divine aspect, or the points stated in the Quran that everything that is
created on earth is for it and that God has breathed some of this spirit into it to
making it a manifestation of Himself.
There is no longer any talk of the above matters, nor even a discussion of internal
human motives, but only a belief in the sanctity of humanity and its intelligence. Now
we see all schools of thought and even the declaration of human rights beginning
their claims with respect for the inherent dignity of human beings. They say this in


order to base their education on its foundation and though each individual is able to
violate the rights of others, this respect for the dignity and sanctity of humanity will
serve as a check to such violations.
Most of those who follow the philosophy of humanitarianism, have criteria different
from those of the past. But the difficulty lies in this same contradiction in the life,
thought and logic of mankind today, a logic which lacks foundation .
I do not think that there are any scholars in the world who would interpret
humanitarianism to mean universal peace. There are, of course, ordinary people who
think all human beings in the world are the same and of equal worth. But this is not
true. One is learned, another is ignorant; one is virtuous, another is impure; one is
tyrannical, another is oppressed; one is benevolent, another is malevolent. Should
we consider them all the same from a humanitarian point of view, irrespective of their
knowledge, faith, chastity and benevolence or vice versa?
If we say so, we are betraying humanity. Let me give an example. Both A and B are
human beings who are biologically similar. If you dislike one of them, it has nothing to
do with his blood group. But if you are humanitarian, you cannot be indifferent to both
of them and claim that they are equally human; for then both should be equally liked,
or both equally disliked. But this is not so since the human being's basic difference
with animals is that the human being has more potentiality than animals and less
actuality. What does that mean? A horse on its birth possesses all the peculiarities
that a horse should have and if it has less than that, it can gain it by practice. But a
human being has potential only at birth. lt is not known what he or she will be in the
future. The shape is human hut that person may, in reality, become a wolf or a sheep
or a human being.
Mulla Sadra, the great Iranian Islamic philosopher, in pointing out the error of people
in thinking human beings equal in everything, says that there are as many kinds of
individuals as there are individuals. He is, of courses regarding the human being
philosophically, not biologically. A biologist pays attention to human organs and
limbs, while a philosopher concentrates on the human being's qualities and thus he
cannot believe that human beings are all of the same kind. That is why human values
are potential. Some attain the height of humanity while others fail to do so. As Hadrat
Ali says, "The shape is humans but the mind may be a beast." Not all individuals
have an interior proportionate to their exterior.
As I said before, to a great extent, the world is returning, once again to the school of
humanity, meaning that philosophies of humanity have appeared; and the strangest
of them all is the creed of humanity which Auguste Compte originated in the middle
of the 19th century. This man wavered between his intelligence and mind on the one


hand and his heart and conscience on the other and came to the conclusion that the
human being needed a creed, the absence of which results in all kinds of social
corruption. According to him, past religion (Catholicism) is not adequate enough for
modern mankind. He describes three stages of religion; The divine supernatural
stage, the philosophical reasoning stage and the scientific positive stage. He said
that Catholicism belonged to the human being's supernatural thinking and this is not
acceptable to the person of the scientific age. His invented religion however, lacked
an occult root, but he accepted all the traditions and rites which existed before, and
even proposed having priests in this new creed, presenting himself as its prophet,
but a prophet without a god. They say about him that he got his rites from
Catholicism and he was criticized for this since he disbelieved that religion but
imitated and adopted its ceremonies and traditions. He was right in one thing, that
the human being needs worship and devotion as well as the performance of a
number of rites.
He seems to have found a large number of followers in Europe and America and his
house has become a center of pilgrimage for them. According to some Arabic books,
he had fallen in love with a lady whose husband had been condemned to life
imprisonment, but she died before he could win her and consequently he turned
away frown the world of the intellect to the world of sentiments and eventually started
his creed of humanity. This lady-love is considered by his followers as holy as Mary,
the mother of Christ. But this school of humanity underwent a number of changes
which gave it its present form.
One of the questions concerning the human being is freedom and responsibility. Is
the human being really free and independent or does it have a responsibility and a
mission to perform? According to the Quran, the human being is faced with no
compulsion before God. On the contrary, the human being is created a free being
with a fixed responsibility and mission. The Holy Quran refers to the human being as
the vice-gerent of God, while no others Holy book has given such sanctity to the
human being.
God says in the Quran, "And when your Lord said to the angels, I am setting on
the earth a vice-gerent, they said,What will You set therein one who will do
corruption there and shed blood ... But God answered, Assuredly I know what
you know not." (2:28)
All that, is evidence of the human being's talents and potentialities. You see, then,
that Islam, which is a school of humanity, believes in the exalted position of the
human being from a philosophical point of view. The Quran says again that God
taught the human being the names of all things. Then it showed itself superior to the
angels in this knowledge and God reproached the angels for what they did not know
about humanity and while they supposed the human being to be a creature of wrath


and lust, they had ignored the other side of its character. The angels confessed their
ignorance and begged for His forgiveness. Then God told the angels to prostrate
themselves before His creature.
The greatest interpretation that can be given to this command in order to show the
human being's mission freedom and option is that God makes it the vice-gerent of
and the successor to himself. God is the Creator and here He confers some of His
creative power on the human being to benefit from.
Another question shout the human being is its happiness and pleasure. I say briefly
that the human being seeks pleasure. Where Should it be found? Is it from within the
self or from without, or from both within and without and in what proportion? Those
who focus their attention on sures outside themselves, wrongly supposing that the
whole joy of life is this, have not been able to know themselves as human beings.
They cannot consider the life within themselves as a source of joy and pleasure.
Their exhilaration lies in a wine-cup, a cabaret.
How well does Rumi describe a person addicted to drinking and direct that person to
righteousness and away from evil saying,
You are the symbol of existence, wherefore do you seek annihilation?
You who are an ocean, what do you intend to become?
Why do you make yourself indebted to wine?
He continues to say that the human being is the essence and the world is the form.
It is equally wrong to reject all external things and go to the other extreme of thinking
that all joys must be sought internally. In some poems of Rumi we come across such
an exaggeration when he says,
Consider that the way of pleasure is all from within, not without
And think it foolish to abandon customs and traditions.
Someone is happy and intoxicated in the corner of prison,
And another is full of grief in his garden.
He does not mean that all external things should be put aside but, at the same time,


it Should not be supposed that all joys are found in material things. The self is the
center of joy and there should be an equilibrium between the internal and external.
There are many things to say about the human being. The school of thought which
considers itself human should be able to answer certain questions in order to be
accepted as a true human school. The human being was considered as the door of
spirituality, that is, one could discover the spiritual work through one's own essence.
Spirituality and humanism or religion and humanism are two inseparable matters. We
cannot accept one of them and abandon the other . The contradiction which we claim
to exist in various genuine humanistic schools lies in this point that when humanity
suffered a downfall, however wrongly, namely through a change in the Ptolemaic
astronomy, it should not make us doubt the exalted position of the human being as a
goal in the course of creation. The human being is the goal of the universe whether
the earth is the center of the universe or not. What does the phrase 'goal of the
universe' mean? It means that nature moves in a certain direction in its evolutionary
course whether we consider the human being a spontaneously created being or a
continuation of other animal species. it makes no difference to this process whether
we think it to possess a divine spirit or not.
God has said, "We have breathed some of Our spirit into him." He has not said
that the human being is the race of God. If He had said that thee substance of which
the human being is made was brought from another world, then the human being
would be a lofty and sacred being.
To those of you whose philosophy is humanitarian, we say, is there a sentiment in
the human being either called benevolence, goodness or service, or not? If you say
there is not, then to attribute Such a quality to the human being would be as
meaningless as calling him a stone or an animal. But the human being has the
sentiment. What is it? Some one may say the feeling of service in us is a kind of
substitution. What does that mean? When we witness something and our
humanitarian feeling is supposedly roused to go and instruct, serve and save the
oppressed, we are told that if we ponder about it, we as human beings are putting
ourselves in their place, thinking of them first as belonging to our group or our group
related to them and then we substitute ourselves for them. Then, the feeling of
selfishness which makes us defend ourselves is roused to defend the oppressed;
otherwise there is no genuine sentiment in the human being to defend an oppressed
person directly.
The school of humanity must firstly answer whether such a sentiment exists in the
human being or not? We answer that it does on the basis of its being appointed the
vice-gerent of God and as the manifestation of divine generosity and benevolence. It
means that while the human bring in its Selfishness is duty-bound to show activity for
its survival, tile whole of its existence is not selfishness. The human being also has


benevolence, humanity, world-build ing and moral conscience.
Some time ago when I was in Shiraz, an organization called the Happy Organization
was introduced to me consisting of individuals with an internal sentiment and
personal faith and a gathering of the deaf and dumb. I visited one of their classes.
For us fastidious people it would he exhausting to spend even one hour in such a
class and watch them and their strange gesticulations for a remark. Their teacher
was a Sayyid who was named after the first son of Imam and he was showing a
great deal of interest and sympathy in those children even though his salary was less
than an elementary school teacher's, for that organization was short of funds. He
taught them how to write and made them understand words with a great expenditure
of effort.
What is this sentiment in the human being? It is the manifestation of humanity and its
genuineness. Generally speaking, what is this sense of praise for the good and
dislike for the sick, even though they belong to the distant past? When we hear the
names of Yazid and Shimr and remember their wickedness and crimes, and on the
other hand, when the names of the martyrs of Karbala are mentioned, we have a
feeling of hatred for the first group and a sense of wonder and respect for the latter.
What is the reason for it? Is it a class feeling which makes us think of ourselves as
belonging to the group of the martyrs of Karbala and dislike Yazid and Shimr as we
dislike our enemies? Do we project our feelings of sympathy and hatred on to each
group respectively, while in truth both are related to ourselves? If this is so then the
person you consider your enemy will be no different from you. For in his turn he has
the right to praise those you dislike and hate those you praise.
On the contrary you may look upon it from a different angle which is not personal and
individual but is related to the whole of humanity in which there is no question of
personal dislike but the truth. There your connection with the martyrs in your praise,
and your dislike of their enemies, is not personal but general and universal.
The school of humanity must supply an answer to what these feelings are and
whence they arise and to such problems as the human being's honest love of
gratitude, to some one who has done a good deed. When the genuineness of human
values are discovered, then the question of the human being crops up. Is the human
being who has such genuine qualities the same person spoken of by materialism? Is
that person a machine, a satellite? A machine, however big, is only big, if a machine
is made a thousand times bigger than an Apollo, what could we say about it? We
could say it is great, amazing and extraordinary but not noble or sacred. Even if it is
made a billion times bigger, possessing a billion pieces, again it can only be called
amazing and extraordinary but never noble, holy and honorable. How can the
declaration of human rights and communist philosophers who support human
genuineness in various forms, speak of the human being's inherent prestige and


sacredness without paying attention to God's words saying, "We breathed some of
Our spirit into him," When they ascertain the genuineness of these values then they
can realize the genuineness of the human being itself.
Now supposing we realize this genuineness of the human being is it only the human
being who exists in this universe which is in infinite darkness? As a European says,
is the human being only a drop of sweat in an ocean of poison created accidentally?
Or is the human being a drop of sweet water in a sweet ocean? Does this small light
represent universal light?
Here the relation of the genuineness of the human being with God will become clear,
for both of them are inseparable. In the phrase of the Holy Quran, God is the light
of the heavens and the earth, the word God is not what Aristotle calls the first
Cause for that is different from the God of Islam. His god is separate from and
foreign to the universe. But the God Of Islam, when the phrase, He is the First, He
is the Last, He is the Outer and He is the Inner. (57:3) is heard, it at once gives
you a different view of the universe. Then you understand the meaning of all the
genuine qualities within yourself and realize that there is a goal. You will see that if
you are a beam of light then a whole world of light exists and if you are a drop of
sweat water it is because an infinite ocean of sweetness exists there and a ray of His
light is within you.
Islam is a humanistic school based on human criteria There is nothing in it based on
wrong discriminations between human beings. In Islam there exists no country, race,
blood, zone and language. These things are not an evidence and criterion of
privilege for human beings. That criterion in Islam is those human values. If it
respects those values, it is because it believes in the genuineness of the human
being and the universe; that is, it believes in God Almighty. That is why Islam is the
only humanistic school that has for its foundation proper logic and there exists no
other such school in the world

PERBANDINGAN ISTINBATH HUKUM IMAM AS-SYAFI’I DAN IMAM HANBALI



MAKALAH FIQH MUAMALAH

Dosen : sak karep e

Disusun oleh :
dfsdgfsgfdhghfghgf
PMH SEMESTER III

FAKULTAS BLOGGER
Kampus mahaguru
DUNIA DAN ANGKASA
2010





BAB I
PENDAHULUAN

  1. Latar Belakang Masalah

Empat Imam, masing-masing adalah Abu Hanifah, Malik bin Anas, Muhammad bin Idris Asy-syafi’I dan Ahmad bin Muhammad bin hanbal adalah para pendiri empat Madzhab Fiqh yang teersebar luas diseluruh penjuru dunia dan masyhur dikalagan umat sejak dulu hingga sekarang. Mereka telah meretas jalan bagi embrio pertumbuhan fiqh Islam sejak awal prkembangan Islam hingga masa kejayaan Imam-imam Madzhab.
Namun, dalam melakukan Istinbath diantara para Imam Madzhab selalu berbeda antara madzhab yang satu degan madzhab yang lainnya. Oleh karena itu, penulis akan membahas tentang perbandingan istinbath antara Istibath Madzhab As-Syafi’I dengan Madzhab hanbali.











BAB II
PEMBAHASAN
PERBANDINGAN ISTINBATH HUKUM IMAM AS-SYAFI’I DAN IMAM HANBALI

  1. Biografi Imam Asy-Syafi’i
Muhammad bin Idris bin Al-Abbas bin Utsman bin Syafi’i bin Ubaid bin Abdu Yazid bin Hasyim bin Al- Muttalib (ayah Abdul Muttalib kakek Rasulullah Shallallahu ‘alaihi wa Salam) bin Abdi Manaf. Beliau bertemu nasabnya dengan Rasulullah Shallallahu ‘alaihi wa Salam pada Abdi Manaf. Beliau bergelar Nashirul hadits (pembela hadits), karena kegigihannya dalam membela hadits dan komitmennya untuk mengikuti sunnah Nabi Shallallahu ‘alaihi wa Salam1.
Kelahiran
Imam Al-Baihaqi menyebutkan,”Imam Asy-Syafi’I dilahirkan dikota Ghazzah, kemudian dibawa ke Asqalan, lalu dibawa ke Mekkah.2
Ibnu Hajar menambahkan,” Imam Asy-Syafi’i dilahirkan di sebuah tempat bernama Ghazzah di kota Asqalan. Ketika berusia dua tahun ibunya membawanya ke Hijaz dan hidup bersama orang-orang keturunan Yaman karena ibunya dari suku Azdiyah. Diusia 10 tahun, Ibnu Hajar menambahkan,”Imam Asy-Syafi’i dilahirkan di sebuah tempat bernama Ghazzah di kota Asqalan. Ketika berusia dua tahun ibunya membawanya ke Hijaz dan hidup bersama orang-orang keturunan Yaman karena ibunya dari suku Azdiyah. Diusia 10 tahun, beliau dibawa ke Mekkah karena khawatir nasabnya yang mulia akan leyap.3
DASAR-DASAR IMAM ASY-SYAFI'i DALAM MENETAPKAN AQIDAH (ISTINBATH HUKUM)
Sebagaimana para ulama salaf lainnya, Imam Asy- Syafi’i membuat beberapa landasan (Kaidah) dalam menetapkan Kaidah di antaranya adalah sebagai berikut:
  1. Kaidah pertama: Iltizam (komitmen) terhadap Al-Qur’an dan Sunnah dan mendahulukan keduanya dari akal.
Mengambil lahiriyah Al-Qur’an dan sunnah dan menjadikan keduanya sebagai landasan dan sumber dalam menetapkan aqidah islamiyah. Apa yang ditetapkan oleh keduanya maka wajib diterima dan apa yang dinafikan oleh keduanya wajib untuk ditolak, Allah
Subhanahu wa Ta’ala berfirman,
 “Dan tidaklah patut bagi laki-laki yang mukmin dan tidak (pula) bagi perempuan yang mukmin, apabila Allah dan Rasul-Nya telah menetapkan suatu ketetapan, akan ada bagi mereka pilihan (yang lain) tentang urusan mereka. dan Barangsiapa mendurhakai Allah dan Rasul-Nya Maka sungguhlah Dia telah sesat, sesat yang nyata”.
Imam Asy-Syafi’i berkata,” Aku beriman kepada Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’ala dan apa yang datang dari Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’ala sesuai yang diinginkan oleh Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’ala. Dan aku beriman kepada Rasulullah Shallallahu ‘alaihiwa Salam dan apa yang datang dari Rasulullah Shallallahu ‘alaihi wa Salam sesuai dengan apa yang dimaksudkan Rasulullah Shallallahu ‘alaihi wa Salam4 ”.
Kedudukan As-Sunnah menurut Imam Syafi’i dan bantahan beliau terhadap orang yang mengingkar sunnah sebagai hujjah.
Imam Asy-Syafi’i berkata,” Semua yang datang dari sunnah merupakan penjelasan dari al-Qur’an. Maka setiap orang yang menerima Al-Qur’an, maka wajib menerima sunnah Rasulullah, karena Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’ala mewajibkan hamba-Nya untuk mentaati Rasul-Nya dan mematuhi hukum-hukumnya. Orang yang menerima apa yang datang dari Rasulullah Shallallahu ‘alaihi wa Salam berarti ia telah menerima apa yang datang dari Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’ala, karena Dia telah mewajibkan kita untuk mentaatinya5”.
Beliau berdalil dengan sejumlah ayat diantaranya
firman Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’ala :
 “Hai orang-orang yang beriman, taatilah Allah dan taatilah Rasul (Nya), dan ulil amri di antara kamu. kemudian jika kamu berlainan Pendapat tentang sesuatu, Maka kembalikanlah ia kepada Allah (Al Quran) dan Rasul (sunnahnya), jika kamu benar-benar beriman kepada Allah dan hari kemudian. yang demikian itu lebih utama (bagimu) dan lebih baik akibatnya”.
Bantahan Imam Syafi’i kepada orang yang mengingkari sunnah sebagai hujjah.
  1. Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’ala telah mewajibkan kita untuk mengikuti sunnah Rasulullah Shallallahu alaihi wa Salam dan menyuruh kita mematuhi perintah dan menjauhi larangannya.
  2. Tidak ada cara lain bagi kita untuk mentaati perintah Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’ala tersebut kecuali dengan mengamalkan apa yang datang dari Rasulullah Shallallahu ‘alaihi wa Salam dengan lapang dada dan bersih hati dari keinginan untuk menolaknya, serta pasrah pada perintah dan hukum- hukumnya.
  3. Seorang muslim membutuhkan sunnah Rasulullah Shallallahu ‘alaihi wa Salam untuk menjelaskan globalitas isi Al-Qur’an.
Pandangan Imam Asy-Syafi’i tentang hadits Ahad
Hadits Ahad adalah hadits yang tidak memenuhi semua atau sebagian syarat –syarat hadits mutawatir6. Yaitu diriwayatkan oleh orang banyak yang menurut adat dan logika mereka tidak mungkin berdusta, dan diriwayatkan dari orang banyak dan menyandarkan hadit kepada sesuatu yang bisa dirasakan oleh indera.
Adapun kriteria hadits yang diterima oleh Imam
Asy-Syafi’i adalah:
  • Sanadnya bersambung (tidak terputus).
  • Para perawinya adil.
  • Perawinya dhabit (tepat dan sempurna hafalannya).
  • Selamat dari syudzuz (riwayatnya tidak bertentangan dengan riwayat orang lain yang lebih tsiqah).
  • Selamat illat (cacat) yang membuatnya tercela.
Dengan demikian selama hadits itu shahih dari Rasulullah Shallallahu ‘alaihi wa Salam, maka Imam Asy- Syafi’i akan menerimanya. Ketika ditanya tentang, sebagaimana jawaban beliau ketika ditanya oleh Sa’idbin Asad tentang hadits ru’yah (salah satuhadits ahad), beliau berkata,” Hai Ibnu Asad, hukumlah aku, baik aku hidup atau mati, jika aku tidak mengikuti hadits shahih yang datang dari Rasulullah, sekalipun aku tidak mendengarnya langsung”.
Dengan demikian, maka Imam Asy-Syafi’i mewajibkan menggunakan hadits Ahad dalam seluruh perkara agama, dengan tidak ada pembedaan baik dalam masalah aqidah atau lainnya. orang yang menolak hadits ahad tanpa alasan yang dibenarkan, merupakan satu kesalahan yang tidak bisa dimaafkan.
  1. Kaidah kedua: Menghormati pemahaman sahabat dan mengikutinya.
Imam Asy-Syafi’i berkata,” Selama orang mendapati Al-Qur’an dan As-Sunnah, maka tidak ada jalan lain baginya selain mengikutinya. Jika keduanya tidak ada, kita harus mengambil ucapan para sahabat atau salah satu dari mereka atau ucapan para imam seperti Abu Bakar, Umar dan Utsman. Ucapannya lebih patut diambil dari yang lainnya.
Ilmu itu bertingkat-tingkat, di antaranya:
  1. Al-Kitab dan As-Sunnah yang shahih.
  2. Ijma’ (konsensus/ kesepakatan) para ulama terhadap masalah yang tidak ada ayat atau haditsnya.
  3. Ucapan sebagian sahabat yang tidak ditentang oleh seorangpun dari mereka.
  4. Ikhtilaf para sahabat dalam masalah tersebut.
  5. Qiyas terhadap sebagian tingkatan, tidak boleh mengambil selain Al-Kitab dan As-Sunnah selama keduanya ada, karena ilmu itu hanya diambil dari yang lebih tinggi7.
  1. Kaidah ketiga: Menjauhi pengikut hawa nafsu, pelaku bid’ah ahli kalam dan mencela mereka.
Bid’ah secara bahasa berarti mencipta dan mengawali sesuatu. Sedangkan menurut istilah, bidah berarti cara baru dalam agama(yang belum ada contoh sebelumnya yang menyerupai syariah dan bertujuan untuk dijalankan dan berlebihan dalam beribadah kepada Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’ala8.
Imam Syafi’i membagi perkara baru menjadi dua:
  1. Perkara baru yang bertentangan dengan Al-Kitab dan As-Sunnah atau atsar (sahabat) dan ijma’. Ini adalah bidah dhalalah.
  2. Perkara baru yang baik tetapi tidak bertentangan dengan Al-Kitab dan As-Sunnah atau atsar (sahabat) dan ijma’. Ini adalah bidah yang tidak tercela.
Inilah yang dimaksud dengan perkataan Imam Syafi’i yang membagi bid’ah menjadi dua yaitu bid’ah mahmudah (terpuji) dan bid’ah mazmumah (tercela/ buruk). Bidah yang sesuai dengan sunnah adalah terpuji dan baik, sedangkan yang bertentangan dengan sunnah ialah tercela dan buruk9
  1. Biografi Imam Hanbali
Nama lengkap beliau adalah Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Hanbal bin Hilal Asy Syaibani. Beliau lebih dikenal dengan sebutan Ibnu Hanbal, dinisbahkan pada kakeknya, sehingga mazhabnyapun oleh kaum Muslimin masyhur dengan sebutan mazhab Hanbali. Ketika meneliti silsilah keluarga dan nasab Imam Ahmad, beliau bertemu dengan nasab Nabi Muhammad saw pada Nizar bin Ma’ad bin Adnan. Beliau adalah keturunan Rabi’ah bin Nizar, sementara Nabi saw adalah keturunan Muzhar bin Nizar.
Meskipun dilahirkan di Baghdad, Irak, kedua orang tua beliau berasal dari Marw, satu wilayah di Khurasan. Mereka kemudian pindah ke Baghdad. Kepindahan tersebut terjadi ketika ibunya sedang mengandung Ahmad bin Hanbal. Tiga tahun setelah kelahirannya, ayahnya, Muhammad bin Hanbal, wafat. Sejak saat itu, Ahmad bin Hanbal dibesarkan oleh ibunya.
Meskipun hidup dalam keadaan yatim dan dalam lingkungan keluarga yang miskin, namun berkat bimbingan ibunya yang shalihah, sejak kecil Imam Ahmad telah memulai riwayat pendidikannya. Dalam suasana serba kekurangan, beliau gigih menuntut ilmu, sehingga dalam usia 14 tahun beliau telah menghafal Al-Qur’an keseluruhannya. Karena kecintaannya yang mendalam terhadap ilmu, beliau memulai safari ilmiahnya sejak berusia 16 tahun. Beliau pergi ke Makkkah, Madinah, Syam, Yaman, Basrah dan negara-negara lain untuk mengumpulkan hadits-hadits Nabi.
Beliau menuntut ilmu dari banyak guru yang terkenal dan ahli di bidangnya. Misalnya dari kalangan ahli hadits adalah Yahya bin Sa’id al Qathan, Abdurrahman bin Mahdi, Yazid bin Harun, sufyan bin Uyainah dan Abu Dawud ath Thayalisi. Dari kalangan ahli fiqh adalah Waki’ bin Jarah, Muhammad bin Idris asy Syafi’i (pendiri mazhab Syafi’i) dan Abu Yusuf (sahabat Abu Hanifah ) dan lain-lain. Dalam ilmu hadits, beliau mampu menghafal sejuta hadits bersama sanad dan hal ikhwal perawinya.
Dari hasil kegigihan Ahmad bin Hanbal melakukan pengembaraan dalam menuntut ilmu dapat dilihat dari karyanya yang masyhur dikenal dengan nama Al-Musnad. Karya ini adalah sebuah ontologi hadits-hadits Nabi Muhammad yang disusun berdasarkan urutan nama para sahabat yang meriwayatkan hadits-hadits tersebut. Di dalam karya ini, terdapat sekitar 30.000 hadits yang disusun berdasarkan klasifikasi sahabat-sahabat Nabi saw. Klasifikasi tersebut dimulai dari hadits-hadits sepuluh sahabat yang telah direkomendasi oleh Nabi Muhammad untuk masuk surga, sahabat-sahabat senior di luar sepuluh sahabat tersebut, sahabat-sahabat yang tergolong ahlu bait nabi, sisa sahabat-sahabat senior, juga sahabat-sahabat yang berdiam di Makkah-Madinah-Syam-Kufah, sisa sahabat-sahabat Anshar, sampai kemudian ditutup dengan hadits-hadits dari para sahabat nabi yang berasal dari kabilah-kabilah di luar Makkah dan Madinah.
Karya-karya beliau yang lain mencakup, Tafsir al Qur’an, An Nasikh wa al Mansukh, Al Muqaddam wa Al Muakhar fi al Qur’an, Jawabat al Qur’an, At Tarih, Al Manasik Al Kabir, Al Manasik Ash Shaghir, Tha’atu Rasul, Al ‘Ilal, Al Wara’ dan Ash Shalah.
  1. Kekhususan Fiqih Hanbali dalam menetapkan hukum (Istinbath Hukum)
Sumber utama pengambilan dalil dalam istinbath (penetapan) hukum dalam Mazhab Hanbali adalah Al-Qur’an dan As-Sunnah. Ulama-ulama dalam mazhab ini tidak mengenal adanya perbedaan antara Al-Qur’an dan As-Sunnah, keduanya saling mendukung dan saling menetapkan. Pemisahan antara keduanya adalah kesesatan dan bagi siapa saja yang melakukannya akan mendapat permusuhan yang keras dari mazhab ini. Bagi mazhab ini segala sesuatu yang diputuskan (difatwakan) sahabat Nabi saw dan para fukaha adalah juga merupakan hujjah (dalil/bukti). Mereka pun menetapkan kebolehan berdalil dengan hadits-hadits yang berderajatdhoif dan mursal (selama berderajat tidak tertolak dan mungkar dan tidak bertentangan dengan Al-Qur’an). Selain itu ketika tidak ditemukan satu pun ayat Al-Qur’an, hadits shohih, perkataan para sahabat atau pendapat dari mereka dan riwayat-riwayat yang berderajat dhoif dan mursal, maka mereka memperbolehkan menggunakan kias (qiyas).
Kekhususan lainnya dari mazhab Hanbali adalah menetapkan disiplin yang ketat dalam pelaksanaan ibadah, muamalah dan thaharah (penyucian). Contohnya, pada pelaksanaan wudhu, mazhab ini mewajibkan untuk berkumur-kumur dan istinsyah (menghirup air lewat hidung).
  1. Akidah dan Kalam (Teologi) Mazhab Hanbali
Disebabkan Imam Ahmad dan para pengikutnya berpegang teguh hanya pada teks-teks hadits maka sulit untuk menjelaskan pendapat beliau tentang ilmu kalam (teologi). Karenanya dalam persoalan akidah, sepenuhnya menyandarkan pendapatnya pada Al-Qur’an dan As Sunnah dan cenderung menyalahkan pandangan lain. Misalnya dalam masalah ma’rifatullah (pengenalan terhadap Tuhan) khususnya pada pembahasan sifat-sifat Allah mereka cenderung menyalahkan pendapat Jahmiyah, Qadariyah, Mu’tazilah dan para pengikut mereka.
Dalam pandangan Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal kalam (perkataan) Allah yang termaktub dalam Al-Qur’an bukanlah makhluk. Sikap keteguhan dan ketegasannya memegang pendapatnya bahwa Al-Qur’an bukan makhluk menyebabkan beliau dijebloskan ke penjara. Saat itu kekhalifaan Abbasiyah menetapkan paham Mu’tazilah yang menyatakan Al-Qur’an adalah makhluk dijadikan sebagai mazhab resmi negara. Beliau berada di penjara selama tiga periode kekhalifahan yaitu al Makmun, al Mu’tashim dan terakhir al Watsiq.
Setelah al Watsiq meninggal dan digantikan oleh al Mutawakkil yang arif dan bijaksana maka Imam Ahmad pun dibebaskan. Begitu juga dalam persoalan ru’yat (melihat Allah), bagi beliau adalah sesuatu yang harus diterima, karena diriwayatkan dalam hadits shahih bahwa kelak di akhirat manusia diberi kemampuan untuk bisa melihat Allah SWT. Pada masa kini, mazhab Hanbali di antara keempat mazhab lainnya adalah mazhab yang paling sedikit pengikutnya. Namun ulama dari mazhab ini, tidak lagi menyebut diri mereka sebagai Hanbali namun memperkenalkan diri sebagai pengikut salafi ataupun Wahabi. Karena Abdullah bin Abdul Wahab yang mencetuskan paham Wahabi akar pemikirannya berasal dari prinsip-prinsip pemikiran Ahmad bin Hanbal.
















BAB III
KESIMPULAN

Dari pembahasan diatas dapat disimpulkan bahwa istinbath hukum antara imam as-syafi’I dan imam hanbali adalah sebagai berikut :
  • Mazhab Syafii :
  1. Al-Qur'an
  2. Hadis mengutamakan ketsiqohan rawi
  3. Ijma'
  4. Qiyas
  5. Hadis dhaif.
  6. Qoul Sahabi
  • Mazhab Hanbali :
  1. Al-Qur'an
  2. Hadis
  3. Ijma'
  4. Hadis dhaif
  5. Qoul Sahabi
  6. Qiyas









Daftar Pustaka

Fikih Tathbiqi, Sa’id Manshuri (Aarani)
Chohor Imam Ahli Sunnah wa Jamaat, Muhammad Ra’uf Tawakulli
Tarikh Firqah Islami Jilid I, DR. Husain Shahabari
Al Ammah Al Arba’ah, DR. Ahmad Asy-Syarbaashi
Tahqiq dar Tarikh wa Falsafah Mazahib Ahlu Sunnah, Yusuf Fadhai
Sejarah & Keagungan MADZHAB SYAFI’I, K.H Siradjuddin Abbas
http://books.google.co.id/books?id=kCjpVK9fwn4C&pg=PA168&lpg=PA168&dq=istinbath++madzhab=istinbath%20%20madzhab%20hanbali&f=false
1 Manaaqib Asy-Syafi’i, Baihaqi, 1/472
2 Ibid, 2/71
3 Tawaali At-Ta’sis, hal. 51
4 Majmu’ Fatawa, Syaikhul Islam Ibnu Taimiyah, IV/2, VI/354
5 Al-Risalah, hal. 32-33
6 Syarah Nukhbatul Fikar, Ibnu Hajar AL-Asqalani hal. 4-8
7 Kitab Al-Umm, 5/265
8 Kitab Al-‘Itisham, I/36
9 Hilyah al-Auliya’, 9/113, dan Al-Ba’its ‘ala Inkar Al-Bida’, hal. 15